Match statistics snapshot
- PAOK created the clearer chances on xG (0.52 vs 1.61, Δ 1.09).
- PAOK fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- PAOK held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rīgas Fs | Statistic | Paok |
|---|---|---|
| 0.52 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.61Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rīgas Fs | Statistic | Paok |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 373 | Accurate passes | 471Lead |
| 451 | Total passes | 544Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rīgas Fs | Statistic | Paok |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rīgas Fs | Statistic | Paok |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.60 | Goals prevented | 0.60 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rīgas Fs | Statistic | Paok |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.