Match statistics snapshot
- Arouca created the clearer chances on xG (0.62 vs 1.07, Δ 0.45).
- Arouca fired more attempts (19 vs 5 shots).
- Rio Ave was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Arouca |
|---|---|---|
| 0.62 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.07Lead |
| 7 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 0 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Arouca |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 250 | Accurate passes | 437Lead |
| 335 | Total passes | 522Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Arouca |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Arouca |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Arouca |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.