Match statistics snapshot
- Rio Ave created the clearer chances on xG (1.77 vs 0.68, Δ 1.09).
- Rio Ave fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- AVS was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Avs |
|---|---|---|
| 1.77Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.68 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Avs |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 371Lead | Accurate passes | 212 |
| 455Lead | Total passes | 295 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Avs |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Avs |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.01 | Goals prevented | 0.01 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Avs |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 6 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |