Match statistics snapshot
- Rio Ave created the clearer chances on xG (1.14 vs 0.51, Δ 0.63).
- Rio Ave fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Rio Ave was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 1.14Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.51 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 232 | Accurate passes | 388Lead |
| 326 | Total passes | 496Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.