Match statistics snapshot
- Rio Ave created the clearer chances on xG (0.52 vs 0.20, Δ 0.32).
- Rio Ave fired more attempts (8 vs 6 shots).
- Rio Ave was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 0.52Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.20 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 543Lead | Accurate passes | 234 |
| 627Lead | Total passes | 318 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |