Match statistics snapshot
- Casa Pia created the clearer chances on xG (1.05 vs 1.33, Δ 0.28).
- Rio Ave fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Rio Ave was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 1.05 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.33Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 299 | Accurate passes | 341Lead |
| 393 | Total passes | 438Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -1.22 | Goals prevented | -1.22 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.