Match statistics snapshot
- Rio Ave created the clearer chances on xG (2.97 vs 1.89, Δ 1.08).
- Casa Pia fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Rio Ave was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 2.97Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.89 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 271Lead | Accurate passes | 255 |
| 343Lead | Total passes | 327 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.22 | Goals prevented | -0.22 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 23 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.