Match statistics snapshot
- Estoril created the clearer chances on xG (1.05 vs 1.21, Δ 0.16).
- Rio Ave fired more attempts (18 vs 8 shots).
- Estoril was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 39%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 1.05 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.21Lead |
| 6 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 402Lead | Accurate passes | 288 |
| 485Lead | Total passes | 369 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -0.84 | Goals prevented | -0.84 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.