Match statistics snapshot
- Estoril created the clearer chances on xG (0.17 vs 3.19, Δ 3.02).
- Estoril fired more attempts (24 vs 2 shots).
- Estoril was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 0.17 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.19Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 367 | Accurate passes | 542Lead |
| 437 | Total passes | 607Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| 0.00 | Goals prevented | 0.00 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.