Match statistics snapshot
- Famalicao created the clearer chances on xG (0.25 vs 0.85, Δ 0.60).
- Famalicao fired more attempts (13 vs 5 shots).
- Famalicao was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 0.25 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.85Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 333Lead | Accurate passes | 257 |
| 427Lead | Total passes | 327 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.