Match statistics snapshot
- Rio Ave created the clearer chances on xG (1.91 vs 0.98, Δ 0.93).
- Farense was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 1.91Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.98 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 4Lead |
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 328Lead | Accurate passes | 278 |
| 407Lead | Total passes | 372 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.