Match statistics snapshot
- FC Porto created the clearer chances on xG (1.38 vs 1.52, Δ 0.14).
- FC Porto fired more attempts (23 vs 9 shots).
- FC Porto held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 1.38 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.52Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 23Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 159 | Accurate passes | 446Lead |
| 240 | Total passes | 529Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.31 | Goals prevented | -0.31 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |