Match statistics snapshot
- FC Porto created the clearer chances on xG (0.18 vs 2.01, Δ 1.83).
- FC Porto fired more attempts (19 vs 7 shots).
- FC Porto was more accurate in front of goal (37% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 0.18 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.01Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 380 | Accurate passes | 433Lead |
| 449 | Total passes | 496Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.15 | Goals prevented | 0.15 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.