Match statistics snapshot
- FC Porto created the clearer chances on xG (0.58 vs 1.97, Δ 1.39).
- FC Porto fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- FC Porto was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 0.58 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.97Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 331 | Accurate passes | 371Lead |
| 401 | Total passes | 441Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.50 | Goals prevented | 0.50 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |