Match statistics snapshot
- Rio Ave created the clearer chances on xG (2.65 vs 0.15, Δ 2.50).
- Rio Ave fired more attempts (15 vs 5 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Gil Vicente |
|---|---|---|
| 2.65Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.15 |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 3Lead |
| 0 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Gil Vicente |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 408Lead | Accurate passes | 359 |
| 479Lead | Total passes | 435 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Gil Vicente |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Gil Vicente |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Gil Vicente |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |