Match statistics snapshot
- Guimaraes created the clearer chances on xG (0.18 vs 2.59, Δ 2.41).
- Guimaraes fired more attempts (16 vs 5 shots).
- Rio Ave was more accurate in front of goal (80% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Guimaraes |
|---|---|---|
| 0.18 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.59Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Guimaraes |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 227 | Accurate passes | 459Lead |
| 327 | Total passes | 548Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Guimaraes |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Guimaraes |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.81 | Goals prevented | -0.81 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Guimaraes |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |