Match statistics snapshot
- Rio Ave created the clearer chances on xG (1.43 vs 0.43, Δ 1.00).
- Rio Ave fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Portimonense was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Portimonense |
|---|---|---|
| 1.43Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.43 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Portimonense |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 343 | Accurate passes | 373Lead |
| 428 | Total passes | 471Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Portimonense |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Portimonense |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Portimonense |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |