Match statistics snapshot
- Rio Ave created the clearer chances on xG (0.26 vs 0.07, Δ 0.19).
- Rio Ave fired more attempts (4 vs 3 shots).
- Rio Ave was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Sporting Cp |
|---|---|---|
| 0.26Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.07 |
| Offsides | ||
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 2Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 1Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Sporting Cp |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 36 | Accurate passes | 81Lead |
| 46 | Total passes | 89Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Sporting Cp |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Sporting Cp |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| Goalkeeper saves | ||
| 0.42 | Goals prevented | 0.42 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Sporting Cp |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Fouls | 2 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |