Match statistics snapshot
- Rio Ave created the clearer chances on xG (2.27 vs 0.75, Δ 1.52).
- Rio Ave was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 23%).
- Tondela held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Tondela |
|---|---|---|
| 2.27Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.75 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Tondela |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 312 | Accurate passes | 335Lead |
| 374 | Total passes | 400Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Tondela |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Tondela |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.27 | Goals prevented | 0.27 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rio Ave | Statistic | Tondela |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 15 |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 7 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |