Match statistics snapshot
- River Plate fired more attempts (23 vs 5 shots).
- Aldosivi was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 26%).
- River Plate held more of the ball (72% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| River Plate | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| River Plate | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 72%Lead | Ball possession | 28% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 493Lead | Accurate passes | 158 |
| 570Lead | Total passes | 224 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| River Plate | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| River Plate | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| River Plate | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.