Match statistics snapshot
- River Plate fired more attempts (25 vs 5 shots).
- River Plate was more accurate in front of goal (28% on target vs 20%).
- River Plate held more of the ball (76% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| River Plate | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| River Plate | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| 76%Lead | Ball possession | 24% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 631Lead | Accurate passes | 143 |
| 714Lead | Total passes | 218 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| River Plate | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| River Plate | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| River Plate | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.