Match statistics snapshot
- River Plate created the clearer chances on xG (3.12 vs 1.38, Δ 1.74).
- River Plate fired more attempts (27 vs 11 shots).
- River Plate was more accurate in front of goal (37% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| River Plate | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| 3.12Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.38 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| River Plate | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 369Lead | Accurate passes | 195 |
| 471Lead | Total passes | 310 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| River Plate | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| River Plate | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 0.43 | Goals prevented | 0.43 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| River Plate | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.