Match statistics snapshot
- River Plate fired more attempts (26 vs 7 shots).
- River Plate was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 29%).
- River Plate held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| River Plate | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 26Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| River Plate | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 440Lead | Accurate passes | 200 |
| 525Lead | Total passes | 290 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| River Plate | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| River Plate | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| River Plate | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.