Match statistics snapshot
- River Plate created the clearer chances on xG (2.92 vs 0.04, Δ 2.88).
- River Plate fired more attempts (22 vs 2 shots).
- Blooming was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 41%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| River Plate | Statistic | Blooming |
|---|---|---|
| 2.92Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.04 |
| Offsides | ||
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| River Plate | Statistic | Blooming |
|---|---|---|
| 74%Lead | Ball possession | 26% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 451Lead | Accurate passes | 118 |
| 509Lead | Total passes | 187 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| River Plate | Statistic | Blooming |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| River Plate | Statistic | Blooming |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| -0.80 | Goals prevented | -0.80 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| River Plate | Statistic | Blooming |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |