Match statistics snapshot
- River Plate created the clearer chances on xG (0.92 vs 0.23, Δ 0.69).
- River Plate fired more attempts (11 vs 5 shots).
- Colo Colo was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| River Plate | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.92Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.23 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| River Plate | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 202 | Accurate passes | 407Lead |
| 298 | Total passes | 513Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| River Plate | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| River Plate | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.45 | Goals prevented | 0.45 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| River Plate | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.