Match statistics snapshot
- River Plate created the clearer chances on xG (2.62 vs 1.59, Δ 1.03).
- River Plate fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- River Plate was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| River Plate | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 2.62Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.59 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| River Plate | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 460Lead | Accurate passes | 255 |
| 540Lead | Total passes | 338 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| River Plate | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| River Plate | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 0.41 | Goals prevented | 0.41 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| River Plate | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |