Match statistics snapshot
- River Plate fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- River Plate was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 36%).
- River Plate held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| River Plate | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| River Plate | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 361Lead | Accurate passes | 278 |
| 436Lead | Total passes | 346 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| River Plate | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| River Plate | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| River Plate | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.