Match statistics snapshot
- River Plate created the clearer chances on xG (2.06 vs 0.78, Δ 1.28).
- River Plate fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- River Plate held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| River Plate | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 2.06Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.78 |
| 7 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| River Plate | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 471Lead | Accurate passes | 193 |
| 581Lead | Total passes | 288 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| River Plate | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| River Plate | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.03 | Goals prevented | 0.03 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| River Plate | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.