Match statistics snapshot
- River Plate fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- River Plate was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 30%).
- River Plate held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| River Plate | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| River Plate | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 438Lead | Accurate passes | 285 |
| 535Lead | Total passes | 373 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| River Plate | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| River Plate | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| River Plate | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.