Match statistics snapshot
- Ankaragücü created the clearer chances on xG (0.97 vs 1.55, Δ 0.58).
- Ankaragücü fired more attempts (21 vs 12 shots).
- Ankaragücü was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rizespor | Statistic | Ankaragücü |
|---|---|---|
| 0.97 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.55Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rizespor | Statistic | Ankaragücü |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 178 | Accurate passes | 514Lead |
| 256 | Total passes | 591Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rizespor | Statistic | Ankaragücü |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rizespor | Statistic | Ankaragücü |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rizespor | Statistic | Ankaragücü |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.