Match statistics snapshot
- Rosario Central created the clearer chances on xG (0.95 vs 0.53, Δ 0.42).
- Rosario Central fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- Aldosivi was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 6%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rosario Central | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 0.95Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.53 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rosario Central | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 77%Lead | Ball possession | 23% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 48% |
| 354Lead | Accurate passes | 61 |
| 407Lead | Total passes | 127 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rosario Central | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rosario Central | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.16 | Goals prevented | 0.16 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rosario Central | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.