Match statistics snapshot
- Rosario Central created the clearer chances on xG (0.93 vs 0.42, Δ 0.51).
- Rosario Central fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- Banfield was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rosario Central | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 0.93Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.42 |
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rosario Central | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 69%Lead | Pass accuracy | 54% |
| 207Lead | Accurate passes | 117 |
| 299Lead | Total passes | 216 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rosario Central | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rosario Central | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -0.25 | Goals prevented | -0.25 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rosario Central | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.