Match statistics snapshot
- Rosario Central created the clearer chances on xG (0.49 vs 0.12, Δ 0.37).
- Rosario Central fired more attempts (8 vs 4 shots).
- Newells Old Boys was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rosario Central | Statistic | Newells Old Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 0.49Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.12 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 0 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rosario Central | Statistic | Newells Old Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 66%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 196Lead | Accurate passes | 189 |
| 298 | Total passes | 298 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rosario Central | Statistic | Newells Old Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rosario Central | Statistic | Newells Old Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.34 | Goals prevented | -0.34 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rosario Central | Statistic | Newells Old Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |