Match statistics snapshot
- Rosenborg created the clearer chances on xG (2.29 vs 0.34, Δ 1.95).
- Rosenborg fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Rosenborg was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Aalesund |
|---|---|---|
| 2.29Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.34 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Aalesund |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 346 | Accurate passes | 351Lead |
| 422 | Total passes | 438Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Aalesund |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Aalesund |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Aalesund |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.