Match statistics snapshot
- Rosenborg created the clearer chances on xG (2.02 vs 1.41, Δ 0.61).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
- Rosenborg was more accurate in front of goal (69% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 2.02Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.41 |
| Offsides | ||
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 322 | Accurate passes | 510Lead |
| 387 | Total passes | 571Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.