Match statistics snapshot
- Rosenborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.47 vs 0.73, Δ 0.74).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 1.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.73 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 400 | Accurate passes | 400 |
| 460 | Total passes | 464Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.