Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (0.90 vs 2.13, Δ 1.23).
- Rosenborg fired more attempts (17 vs 12 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 12%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 0.90 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.13Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 430Lead | Accurate passes | 411 |
| 509Lead | Total passes | 489 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.