Match statistics snapshot
- Rosenborg created the clearer chances on xG (3.01 vs 1.01, Δ 2.00).
- Rosenborg fired more attempts (17 vs 6 shots).
- Fredrikstad was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 35%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 3.01Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.01 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 358Lead | Accurate passes | 213 |
| 434Lead | Total passes | 317 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |