Match statistics snapshot
- Ham-Kam fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Rosenborg was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 19%).
- Rosenborg held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 4 |
| 8Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 519Lead | Accurate passes | 278 |
| 608Lead | Total passes | 373 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |