Match statistics snapshot
- Rosenborg created the clearer chances on xG (2.41 vs 0.63, Δ 1.78).
- Ham-Kam fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Rosenborg was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 2.41Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.63 |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 387Lead | Accurate passes | 326 |
| 452Lead | Total passes | 387 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |