Match statistics snapshot
- Rosenborg fired more attempts (10 vs 4 shots).
- Heart Of Midlothian was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Heart Of Midlothian |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 4Lead | Shots off target |
| 1 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Heart Of Midlothian |
|---|---|---|
| Ball possession | ||
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Heart Of Midlothian |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Heart Of Midlothian |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Heart Of Midlothian |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |