Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (0.40 vs 1.86, Δ 1.46).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Rosenborg was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.40 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.86Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 431Lead | Accurate passes | 262 |
| 521Lead | Total passes | 347 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |