Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (1.00 vs 2.05, Δ 1.05).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (13 vs 5 shots).
- KFUM Oslo was more accurate in front of goal (62% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.00 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.05Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 373Lead | Accurate passes | 342 |
| 451Lead | Total passes | 408 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |