Rosenborg 2-0 Lillestrom
Key events
View all
Lillestrom- S. Nordli
- A. Chiakha
RosenborgFT 2–0
Predictions & odds
View allModel outlook versus market-implied chances (overround removed from decimal odds). For entertainment and analysis only — not betting advice.
Estimated outcome
Estimated outcome mix from Sportra's pre-match model
- Rosenborg30.7%
- Draw28.2%
- Lillestrom41.1%
Prematch market
Source: 10Bet
- Rosenborg32.9%
- Draw26.4%
- Lillestrom40.7%
Venue
Lerkendal Stadion
Trondheim · Norway
- Address
- Klæbuveien 125
- Surface
- grass
- Capacity
- 21850
Match
O. Nilsen
Round 8
- Referee
- O. Nilsen
- Round
- 8
- Date
Competition
League · Norway
- Country
- Norway (NO)
- Season
- 2026
- Dates
- 2026-03-14 → 2026-12-13
Match statistics
View allKey metrics
Visual snapshot of possession, chance quality, and shooting.
Possession
51%51%49%49%
Expected goals (xG)
1.8882%0.4118%
Total shots
1864%1036%
Shots on target
457%343%
Team form & competition
View all
- #3 Position
- 46 Points
- 14-4-8 W-D-L
- 53/32 Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 4-0 / 0-3
- Worst defeats
- 0-2 / 3-0
- #4 Position
- 45 Points
- 14-3-9 W-D-L
- 39/35 Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 4-0 / 1-3
- Worst defeats
- 1-4 / 4-0
Head to head
View all8Rosenborgwins
4Drawsmatches
5Lillestromwins
Recorded meetings: 17 (available previous meetings, not necessarily all-time).
- Highest scoring
- Lillestrom 3–4 Rosenborg
- Rosenborg most goals
- Rosenborg 4–0 Lillestrom
- Lillestrom most goals
- Lillestrom 3–0 Rosenborg
Match headlines
/https%3A%2F%2Fsportsmole-media-prod.s3.gra.io.cloud.ovh.net%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F07%2Fhans-erik-odegaard-6a58eefc0c0db190206759.jpg)
/https%3A%2F%2Fsportsmole-media-prod.s3.gra.io.cloud.ovh.net%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F09%2Flille-manager-davide-ancelotti-pictured-vs-real-betis-in-september-2026-zuma-press-wire-6aa41eccb718a012357610.jpg)
Headlines link to a short summary; the full story is on the original publisher’s site.
Rosenborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.88 vs 0.41, Δ 1.47). Rosenborg fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
Lillestrom underperformed their xG by 0.4 goals (0 scored vs 0.41 xG).