Match statistics snapshot
- Stabaek created the clearer chances on xG (2.42 vs 2.88, Δ 0.46).
- Stabaek fired more attempts (20 vs 14 shots).
- Stabaek was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Stabaek |
|---|---|---|
| 2.42 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.88Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Stabaek |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 392Lead | Accurate passes | 280 |
| 488Lead | Total passes | 365 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Stabaek |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Stabaek |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Stabaek |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.