Match statistics snapshot
- Rosenborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.95 vs 0.95, Δ 1.00).
- Rosenborg fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Rosenborg was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 1.95Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.95 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 333 | Accurate passes | 502Lead |
| 406 | Total passes | 574Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rosenborg | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.