Match statistics snapshot
- Rosengård W created the clearer chances on xG (3.46 vs 0.00, Δ 3.46).
- Rosengård W fired more attempts (20 vs 0 shots).
- Rosengård W held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 3.46Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.00 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 0 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 655Lead | Accurate passes | 183 |
| 752Lead | Total passes | 251 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.