Match statistics snapshot
- Rosengård W created the clearer chances on xG (2.93 vs 0.31, Δ 2.62).
- Rosengård W fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- Rosengård W was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 2.93Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.31 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 442Lead | Accurate passes | 227 |
| 534Lead | Total passes | 313 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.