Match statistics snapshot
- Piteå W created the clearer chances on xG (1.20 vs 1.27, Δ 0.07).
- Rosengård W fired more attempts (7 vs 4 shots).
- Piteå W was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 1.20 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.27Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 512Lead | Accurate passes | 318 |
| 609Lead | Total passes | 415 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.