Match statistics snapshot
- Rosengård W created the clearer chances on xG (5.17 vs 0.12, Δ 5.05).
- Rosengård W fired more attempts (28 vs 2 shots).
- Rosengård W held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 5.17Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.12 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 20Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 28Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 564Lead | Accurate passes | 217 |
| 651Lead | Total passes | 296 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rosengård W | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.